Tuesday, 22 November 2011

Entertainment Weekly reveals the giant head from Prometheus

The guys over at Dread Central got hold of a copy of the latest Entertainment Weekly (Issue #1183), and this Thanksgiving edition contains some very interesting news for the Prometheus fans indeed: a small handful of crisp clear stills from Prometheus.

The stills are mainly of the large room of cannisters we've seen in leaked photos before, but this time we also get a proper look at the giant head, and according to EW, Ridley Scott refers to this room as "the Ampule room".

Click on the images below for a better look.


In this next scan we see the giant head again, but this time further back. Elizabeth Shaw (Noomi Rapace) and Kate Dickie's character (currently unnamed) inspecting one of the ampules, while David (Michael Fassbender) approaches the giant head.
In the smaller image we see Meredith Vickers (Charlize Theron) and Captain Janek (Idris Elba) on the bridge of the 'Prometheus'. Take a closer look at Elba's t-shirt. I want one of those for Christmas.

The last scan shows Holloway (Logan Marshall-Green), Elizabeth Shaw (Noomi Rapace) and David (Michael Fassbender), giving us a better look at their spacesuits and Fassbenders lovely green handbag.

Entertainment Weekly #1183 should be available in shops in the US by December 2nd, or earlier if you're a subscriber.

(Source: Dread Central)


71 comments:

  1. I hardly can't wait!!! Am already very horny!

    ReplyDelete
  2. I don't know what I find more frightening between the giant head in the pics or the above comment

    ReplyDelete
  3. To hell with those 16 seconds of phone recorded shit from last week. The detail and intensity here are already making my nipples hard.

    ReplyDelete
  4. im so hot over this my dick is leaking. somebody fuck me...STAT!

    ReplyDelete
  5. Is Logan Marshall-Green an effin' stud or what? (sigh)

    ReplyDelete
  6. The head is sort of scary. I was hoping for more of something like a giant head that Giger designed for the Darkseed game. NOW that was scary/unnerving!

    ReplyDelete
  7. An ampule is a hermetically sealed container which is used to preserve a sample of something from air and contaminants. Now we know the plot.

    maj

    ReplyDelete
  8. Must say those pics look a little naff, as the Brits say.

    ReplyDelete
  9. Im drooling over these pics... can't wait to see the trailer

    ReplyDelete
  10. What the fuck could that giant head be?! Is it a statute, is it animated, will it talk, will it open up? Is that face representative of what the true image of the Space Jockey is? Maybe the Space Jockeys created man in their image. Perhaps that elephantine carcass we saw in the derelict in Alien was merely a suit and mask.

    ReplyDelete
  11. The Empire article back in march suggested that Prometheus may well become the "nightmarish inversion" of Avatar just as Alien was to Star Wars in 1979. These pics go a long way to reinforcing that notion for me, and if ever a film needed a nighmarish inversion, it is the steaming pile of cartoonish Hollywood kak that is Avatar.

    ReplyDelete
  12. "Is that face representative of what the true image of the Space Jockey is?"

    Oh God, I hope not! That would be such a let down. We travel all the way across the galaxy for what? To find ourselves? How exciting....

    ReplyDelete
  13. Speculating here...I don't think the space jockeys are the Gods/engineers. They'll turn out to be a real alien race -- nonhuman in other words -- who give technology to the human party that displeases the Tall human-like Gods/Engineers, hence the meaning of the title of the film.

    ReplyDelete
  14. The Playlist is reporting that Charlize Cheron revealed in a recent interview that Patrick Wilson's role is small and only confined to "flashbacks". This leads me to believe that his character is that of the younger human Bishop, who was the CEO of Weyland Yutani...!

    ReplyDelete
  15. If "God" created Man in his image, whose to say they might not be drawing the same parallel in the context of this film? There are rumours floating about the internet that suggest the Space Jockeys are blue humanoid in appearance.

    ReplyDelete
  16. Will bet my bottom dollar that the ultimate genetic form of the xenomorph that we all know and love will be the result of a tinkering and blending of alien and human and mechanical DNA or whatever, which gives the xenomorph their vicious and savage nature? Would that not be the ultimate irony?

    ReplyDelete
  17. Agreed. Was looking at the Alien costume at Deutsche Film Museum. The humanoid skull under the dome of the head can't be ignored. The Xeno's are part human, and the film will I believe deal with the concept of metamorphosis.

    Who get's morphed? Theron or Rapace? Fassbender I'm sure instigates the process secretly. Bishop spoke about the psychotic nature of earlier androids, I'm sure we'll see more of this. Possibly ;)

    ReplyDelete
  18. "Ampulex Wasp" (aka Ampoule Wasp), is a wasp specimen that inocculates his eggs in a live croackroach. The croackroach is kept alive during all process, till the new wasp emerges.

    ReplyDelete
  19. reminds me of DARK CITY
    http://www.eskimo.com/~noir/ftitles/darkcity2/dc07.jpg

    ReplyDelete
  20. EW uses pics that have a bright, Photoshopped look... The sets were probably overlit for 3D, too... but having said that I really love how this is going. The head and ampule room look scary. I guess the Tron-style suits are worn underneath the Alien-style spacesuits - like a wetsuit worn under a deep-sea diving suit.

    ReplyDelete
  21. Maybe there is no SJ race per say
    What we know as the SJ is actually
    A diseased (or infected) engineer
    That happens towards the end of
    The film?

    ReplyDelete
  22. from the free dictionary:
    ampule
    a small, hermetically sealed glass or plastic container, e.g. one containing medication for parenteral administration or semen for insemination. Called also ampoule.
    Saunders Comprehensive Veterinary Dictionary, 3 ed. © 2007 Elsevier, Inc. All rights reserved

    ReplyDelete
  23. "Will bet my bottom dollar that the ultimate genetic form of the xenomorph that we all know and love will be the result of a tinkering and blending of alien and human and mechanical DNA or whatever, which gives the xenomorph their vicious and savage nature? Would that not be the ultimate irony?"
    -Anon 23 November 2011 03:45

    If Alien 79 is all about the terror of the Outsider, the Other, then what could be worse than learning that we're the real monsters? What is it Bishop says in Alien 3 "It was with us all the way..."

    ReplyDelete
  24. heres a thought to some of you guys - why dont you stop guessing whats going to happen and the exact details of the plot and just wait a few months till you can see the movie?

    its actually not that long now till its out!

    gonna be abit of a mine field avoiding spoilers from now to then...best cut back on this site and imdb

    ReplyDelete
  25. It's not Giger style. ...is really Giger involved?

    ReplyDelete
  26. Hm. I have to say I don't really care too much for the set / costume design. The whole blue-ish space/wet-suites look way too generic too me. I almost feel I've seen them a thousand times before in other scifi movies. What's with the blue colour (suits/ship interior) anyway? I miss the iconic, timeless set/prop design of Alien 1 already ...

    ReplyDelete
  27. yourewelcome:

    i completely agree. the suits look too stylized and sporty. I liked the more utilitarian and decayed design from the previous movies.
    this shit looks too "action-ready". i, for one, am pretty disappointed.

    ReplyDelete
  28. they look like fucking X-men uniforms. WTF!

    ReplyDelete
  29. I think the blue astronaut costumes look totally shit. I was kind of hoping for the white coloured costumes of the first Alien film. The blue costumes make these characters look like fucking superheroes...not the intended image of this new film!

    ReplyDelete
  30. Maybe the ultimate revelation Scott is going to make in this film is that the fusion of human and alien DNA with mechanical technology resulted in the xenomorph. I also interpreted the xenomorph creature as being metaphoric for the most base primal drives of humans...the drives to procreate, consume resources,conquer threats, and ensuring we are the top of the food chain. Thus the xenomorph is just an extreme allegory of...humanity. Just because humans have cultivated civilisation along our evolutionary progress does not necessary erase our true primal nature. Maybe this is the symbolism of the xenomorph.

    ReplyDelete
  31. Pandora, don't open the box! There's a facehugger inside!

    ReplyDelete
  32. The Space Jockeys worship Pinhead from Hellraiser, minus the pins.

    The big three shot has superimposed heads on suited bodies. I'm surprised Fox allowed that, because it looks terrible.

    ReplyDelete
  33. @23rd nov. 19:31

    So you are saying that the prequel is the flip side of alien ressurection??? Great movie that was too....{not}

    ReplyDelete
  34. I think that those themes wanted to be conveyed in Alien Resurrection, just not very well. In that movie,the alien was humanised. Yes, I think that Scott is trying to present a flip side of that in Prometheus, with much more depth and artistic merit. Prometheus is about knowledge and creation. Alien Resurrection was about a kid's science project gone wrong....

    ReplyDelete
  35. The problem, especially among the fans is that this film isn't going to please everyone.

    The spacesuits are shit, noooo we cant have any connection between humans and the Space Jockeys etc.

    Prometheus isnt going to be all things to all men unfortunatly. It's also not a democracy, Mr Scott is making his own movie, the rest of us is just along for the ride!

    ReplyDelete
  36. Big Rich, I think you're right. Perhaps Prometheus is not going to please those people who are looking for a typical action movie. But then again, perhaps it is too early to assume that there will be a vast depth to the movie. Sometimes I wonder whether all this secrecy about the movie is really about Scott wanting people to be surprised and not bring in preconceived notions/parallels from the previous films...OR whether it is merely a publicity stunt intended to boost box office results on opening night. Since we are salivating waiting for this movie and accepting small scraps of information thrown at us, one could be forgiven for thinking that Prometheus is going to be THE movie of the century, like Gone With The Wind or Citizen Kane, but somehow I doubt it. Scott has had his fair share of hits and misses as well. Prometheus may turn out to be a masterpiece of the science-fiction genre...or a verbose, epic disaster of titanic proportions. Remember that John Travolta thought that Battlefield: Earth was a good idea at the time.

    ReplyDelete
  37. These allegories exist for the previous Alien films:

    Alien was about birth.

    Aliens was about motherhood.

    Alien3 was about abortion.

    Alien Resurrection was about incest.

    Prometheus is going to be about intercourse.

    I read those metaphors somewhere else and written by someone else. I am not smart enough to come up with them on my own.

    ReplyDelete
  38. for anyone hating on the space suits, remember that Nostromo was a towing vehicle. "truckers in space," as the makers of the film would call them. The decay idea was that their technology was old, and they did not have the best that the company could give. Check out this link to a new concept design being worked on for a skin tight space suit.
    http://news.nationalgeographic.com/news/2007/07/photogalleries/spacesuit-pictures/index.html
    I have heard that the mission in Prometheus is a higher end research /discovery mission of scientists put together by the corporation. It makes sense that this would be a cleaner and slicker looking ship and crew. It wouldn't make sense to just copy Alien's design just for nostalgic reasons.
    Scott is just showing us a well funded mission, as opposed to Truckers in space, Marines in space, Prisoners in space, Idiot mercenaries in space ( I hated Resurrection.)
    Also, the lighting on these photos is all EW. I don't read that Magazine anymore. Empire!!!

    ReplyDelete
  39. Where is that bloody cat?

    Oh, there it is, next to the SJ.

    ReplyDelete
  40. I'm afraid penetration may be redundant. Think 'Will to Power' and then maybe we have an idea of the themes running through Sir Ridleys head...

    ReplyDelete
  41. All this really makes me smile...You just know Scott will go his own way no matter what people think.. Every1 will just have to wait and see ... 3d rigs require high light levels to work effectively and that super slick look is gonna work well with that depth of field. Atmospher/bells and whistles will be added in post.. Ask yourselves...Scott has made some not so good films but have you ever seen one he made that looked shit?...

    ReplyDelete
  42. i have to agree that the costumes look crap, way to "Star Trek". Hopefully they are a foil to the rough and dirty horrors that await them.

    ReplyDelete
  43. No it wasn't a cat....it was Noomi in her catsuite.

    ReplyDelete
  44. Too much Indiana Jones for me.

    And whenever you see Darth Vader, do you think of Hayden Christensen?
    Whenever i will watch Alien, i will never think of whatever Prometheus will come up with.

    ReplyDelete
  45. What impressed me most about the first film were the scenarios. Remember the dark skies, the lava rocks that served as backdrop to the space ship? Or remember the ambiguity of the alien creature? The charm of the archetype of the spacecraft and its pilot? The simple plot of the film with a sense of mystery about a civilization totally different from the human? DanielO'Bannon, the screenwriter, did not want a sequel of Alien, because it would lose the effect of the first film. He was right.

    ReplyDelete
  46. How can you make such sweeping statement without seeing the film...

    OMG. (head in hands)

    My advise to all you critics is stay away from the movie if you hate it that much already, its clear you have made your minds up already and all you will do is waste 2 hours of your life going to see the film.

    If you cant give this film the chance it deserves, go away and find a movie you do like.

    ReplyDelete
  47. No, all I am saying is that the movie could be good or bad. Since I have not seen it yet (and neither have you for that matter), I will not at this stage assume that it is going to be the cinematic masterpiece of the century.

    ReplyDelete
  48. Dear Big Rich

    A sequel is, by definition, a misguided attempt to revive a brilliant idea that has immortalized a movie. If this new film by Ridley Scott will be a masterpiece or not, is irrelevant. What I meant is that the '"idea" has been used in the first film.

    ReplyDelete
  49. A sequel is not necessarily just a misguided attempt to revive...there are examples of sequels which have surpassed their originating movie. Such example is Ternminator 2: Judgment Day.

    ReplyDelete
  50. Big Rich, you are making a sweeping defence of a film you have not yet seen.

    ReplyDelete
  51. Defence in the fact i will reserve judgement until i have seen the film...

    As if.

    ReplyDelete
  52. But isn't that what I am doing, too?! I never made a foregone conclusion...

    ReplyDelete
  53. Terminator 2? Terminator 2 omg I walked out of that film. What a load of shit. Omg it destroyed any existential overtones of the frist film which is a masterpeice and replaced them with family values omg I can be the only one who saw through that steaming pile of fx shit. Terminator 2 is Camerion selling out in full regalia.. Without out Terminator 2 there would be no Avitar... That other steaming pile of fx. Maybe. Maybe Evil Dead 2 is a better comparison of what ur looking 4. For the rest of you I apologize. MEM

    ReplyDelete
  54. I agree that Avatar is an overated, verbose piece of shit. It merely has beautiful imagery to sustain itself. You would be better off looking at an oil painting.

    ReplyDelete
  55. Anyone care to speculate on the run time of Prometheus? Seems to me it's an epic so it hoots run at least 120 - 140 min. But doesn't Ridley prefer 90ish min stylistically. I'm not sure what his latest like Robbin hood etc are, but his last cut of ALIEN was the shortest yet.

    ReplyDelete
  56. I've got an oil painting or two to sell

    ReplyDelete
  57. Http://markemerrill.blogspot.com

    ReplyDelete
  58. You do your job and
    LET ME DO MINE. YES?

    ReplyDelete
  59. Hi...Ridley? Glad to realise you are monitoring this website.

    ReplyDelete
  60. people !
    some have already made up in their mind what they want to see for an alien prequel. and im sorry this movie is not gonna be that, you know why?
    Because Ridley Scott loves creativity and hires the best and most creative people to work on this movie. so when you people out there whit no imaginations say: This is how i want an alien prequel to be. Ridley will answer : fuck that shit. im gonna come up with something you never have seen before.
    people get dissepointed because the movie wasnt what they were expecting when in fact the movie was more original and diffrent from what they expected.
    If there is ONE director which deserves to make an alien prequel its Ridley because its hes universe and he created it and not you guys. None of you who hates prometheus already have the imagination to create the universe that Ridley created. So show him the respect he deserves. Those haters who are bitching that the spacesuite isnt a total rip-off from the first movie fuck off. you dont deserve to see this movie then. And last of all. Leave Big Rich alone, the guy is fair and isnt jumping on any conclusion so stop giving him shit.
    i wish i was as fair as Big rich, but im not because i know this is gonna be the greatest fucking Sci-Fi movies in YEARS. So fuck you haters, go watch something else, IM gonna fucking watch Prometheus!!!!!!


    Lasse

    ReplyDelete
  61. Yeah, whatever! The higher the expectation, the greater the fall!

    ReplyDelete
  62. Do you think Ridley Scott had the same vision with G. I. Jane?

    ReplyDelete
  63. @anonymous 25 November 2011 15:47

    ALIEN (Director's Cut) - close to 2hours

    Blade Runner Final Cut - close to 2hours

    Body of Lies - 2hours

    Robin Hood (Director's Cut) - 2 and a half hours

    And for people with negative views, at least Prometheus isn't directed by Uwe Boll.

    ReplyDelete
  64. Ridley did G.I. Jane?

    ReplyDelete
  65. Yeah, Scott also directed Body Of Lies...both masterpieces of cinema. Not!

    ReplyDelete
  66. Looks like somebody is on a PR campaign!

    ReplyDelete
  67. I'm a bit disappointed. The Prometheus bridge and spacesuits looks too clean and perfect, while the characters look too fresh-from-the-hairdressers to be taken seriously. What happened to the gritty realism of the original Alien?

    ReplyDelete
  68. The space journey in Prometheus is meant to be a deluxe one, whereas the journey in Alien was merely a truck ride...

    ReplyDelete
  69. Yea I'm sure the production value is all very intentional. IMHO most of the haters are really fan bois jonesing for a trailer... those still just don't get their willies all excited like those movies do... common FOX...

    The Velvet Underground had it right...

    "Twenty-six dollars (price of 3D admission) in my hand..."

    ReplyDelete
  70. Well I guess it might of
    Interesting preproduction
    Value? And Demi More
    With a shaved head might
    Have all seemed exciting
    At the time. I mean Thelma
    And Louise worked, right?

    ReplyDelete